What did the Court rule in Kyllo v. United States (2001) when deciding on the use of a thermal imaging device by law enforcement officers to track the indoor cultivation of marijuana?
A) The use of the thermal imaging device to know the contents of the home was not a search because heat emanating from the house is located in open fields.
B) The use of the thermal imaging device to know the contents of the home was a search because the device was not available to the general public.
C) The use of the thermal imaging device to know the contents of the home was not a search because the defendants did not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in the heat.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The Supreme Court in Olmstead v. United
Q2: The Supreme Court in Goldman v. United
Q3: What are the two elements of the
Q5: Which of the following cases used the
Q6: Which of the following cases used the
Q7: Which areas and objects are protected by
Q8: Which of the following statements is true?
A)
Q9: A person has no reasonable expectation of
Q10: Which of the following surveillance technology devices
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents