In the case of the quail hunters, one hunter was accidentally shot, and it was unclear which of the other hunters was responsible. What was the court's decision about who was to blame?
A) No one is responsible, because it was an accident.
B) Both others are responsible, because they were both negligent.
C) Both others are responsible, because they both had motives.
D) Neither one is responsible, because we can't prove which one did it.
E) The gun manufacturer is responsible for the gun's faulty design.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: Sandra Gillespie's Pinto did what to cause
Q29: Who brought cost-benefit analysis to the government?
A)
Q30: Why does Dowie think that Ford's cost-benefit
Q31: Thomson outlines three things a plaintiff must
Q32: Which lawsuit(s) does Thomson NOT discuss?
A) Sindell
Q34: What does Thomson mean by "freedom of
Q35: Which of the following is not a
Q36: Approximately how many people die every day
Q37: Huber argues that tort law has not
Q38: Roy Anderson believes liability insurance to be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents