Explain the distinction that Donaldson draws between cultural relativism and absolutism (or ethical imperialism). Do you think that one of these views is the correct one? Donaldson tries to create a middle ground between them. Does he succeed in doing this?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Donaldson draws a distinction between cultural relativism and absolutism (or ethical imperialism) by highlighting the differences in their approaches to ethical decision-making. Cultural relativism argues that ethical standards are relative to the culture in which they are practiced, and that there is no universal standard for morality. On the other hand, absolutism (or ethical imperialism) asserts that there are universal ethical principles that should be applied across all cultures, regardless of their specific cultural norms and values.

Donaldson attempts to create a middle ground between these two views by advocating for a "principled relativism" approach. This approach acknowledges the importance of cultural context in shaping ethical beliefs and practices, while also recognizing the existence of universal ethical principles that can serve as a guide for ethical decision-making. Donaldson argues that this middle ground allows for a more nuanced and flexible approach to ethical decision-making, taking into account both cultural diversity and universal ethical standards.

Whether one of these views is the "correct" one is a matter of ongoing debate and philosophical inquiry. Some may argue that cultural relativism allows for greater respect and understanding of diverse cultural practices, while others may argue that absolutism provides a necessary framework for promoting universal human rights and ethical standards. Donaldson's attempt to create a middle ground between these views is commendable, as it seeks to reconcile the strengths of both perspectives. However, it is ultimately up to individual interpretation and ethical reasoning to determine which view is the most appropriate in a given context.

In conclusion, Donaldson's attempt to create a middle ground between cultural relativism and absolutism is a thought-provoking and valuable contribution to the discourse on ethical decision-making. While it may not fully satisfy proponents of either view, it offers a nuanced and balanced approach that takes into account the complexities of cultural diversity and universal ethical principles. Whether or not he succeeds in fully reconciling these views is a matter of ongoing debate and interpretation.

Explain the Distinction That Donaldson Draws Between Cultural Relativism and Absolutism