Chomsky's point in this paper is that a future, complete physics might say that mental properties are fundamental. This would mean that
A) Physicalism was correct.
B) Dualism was correct.
C) There was no longer a difference between physicalism and dualism.
D) Neither physicalism nor dualism was correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q170: We could define "physical" by saying that
Q171: Montero points out the problem that if
Q172: Hempel's dilemma is a problem for defining
Q173: We could define "physical" in terms of
Q174: Montero argues that if a future "complete
Q176: Montero's conclusion to the body problem is
Q177: Montero's suggestion about the mind-body problem is
Q178: Montero thinks that a better question to
Q179: What would be needed to convince Montero
Q180: Why does Montero think there is a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents