Compare this reading to the previous one by Simon Blackburn. How do Zagzebski's and Blackburn's opinions of Pascal's wager compare?
A) Blackburn agrees with Pascal, whereas Zagzebski criticizes him.
B) Blackburn criticizes Pascal, whereas Zagzebski agrees with him.
C) Blackburn and Zagzebski point out different problems with Pascal's wager.
D) Blackburn and Zagzebski both defend Pascal's wager.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q67: Accepting Pascal's wager is
A) Sure to result
Q68: According to Zagzebski, Pascal might respond to
Q69: Zagzebski gives an analogy written by James
Q70: Zagzebski gives an analogy about a wealthy
Q71: Zagzebski gives the analogy between the wealthy
Q73: Explain the "many gods" objection to Pascal's
Q74: Why might one think that Pascal's wager
Q75: Zagzebski points out that you would never
Q76: Do you agree with Scriven that there
Q77: Why do agreement and strong feeling not
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents