In which of the following cases did the court hold that a defendant is not criminally responsible for his or her acts, if at the time he or she committed the acts, he lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law?
A) Montana v. Egelhoff (1996)
B) United States v. Hinckley (1982)
C) United States v. Brawner (1972)
D) State v. Pittman (2007)
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: The M'Naghten test was utilized in American
Q26: The irresistible impulse test was adopted by
Q27: Which of the following court cases led
Q28: Explain the product test.
Q29: Which of the following tests replaced the
Q31: The insanity defense was increasingly modified after
Q32: After 1982 the burden of proving insanity
Q33: Many states added the guilty but mentally
Q34: John Hinckley has remained committed to St.
Q35: Which of the following standards is used
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents