Which of the following represent(s) the standard established by the Court in United States v. Ramirez for determining whether the police do not have to knock and announce before executing a search warrant?
A) The reasonableness of the police action is based on a determination that the facts and circumstances of the particular entry justified entry without a knock and announce.
B) The police must have reasonable suspicion that the knock and announce would serve no purpose.
C) The police must have reasonable suspicion that the knock and announce would inhibit the effective investigation of a crime by allowing for the destruction of evidence.
D) Only a and c
E) All of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A warrant is issued based on _.
A)
Q2: A search warrant requires particularity, meaning:
A) The
Q3: Which of the following statements is incorrect
Q4: Typical explanations for knock and announce rule
Q5: Which of the following is not one
Q7: In Chimel v. California, the Court stated
Q8: Officer Smith places Alice under arrest. Officer
Q9: Under Chimel, if Tom is arrested in
Q10: A search of what is commonly referred
Q11: Which of the following does not reflect
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents