According to the Court in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, informing individuals of their right to refuse consent:
A) Was required of the police officer in order for the consent to be voluntary
B) Would run the risk of individuals refusing consent and interfering with police investigations
C) Would weaken the police officer's ability to quickly resolve criminal matters
D) Was not required but would be considered a factor when determining the voluntariness of the consent
E) All of the above except a
F) All of the above except d
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: In New York v. Belton, the Court
Q14: How did the Court apply their holding
Q15: In Arizona v. Grant, the Court revisited
Q16: Office Johnson saw Troy, a known drug
Q17: The legal test for consent to search
Q19: Which of the following is true about
Q20: Cases where the court has held that
Q21: The legal standard for third party consent
Q22: In regard to third-party authority to consent,
Q23: In regard to third-party to consent, which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents