The Court looks at which of the following in assessing whether or not reasonable suspicion existed for a stop?
A) Whether the officer had specific and articulable facts, that together with a rationale inference drawn from those facts, reasonably suggest that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime
B) Whether a reasonable person, looking at the facts the officer relied on, would determine that the facts reasonably suggest that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime
C) Both a and b
D) Neither a nor b
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: A Terry stop is based on:
A) Reasonable
Q3: How did the Court distinguish a Terry
Q4: Under what circumstances can a police officer
Q5: What two interests were balanced by the
Q6: Under the Court's ruling in Terry, how
Q8: Reasonable suspicion can be based on:
A) Police
Q9: Under which of the following circumstances can
Q10: Which of the following is incorrect about
Q11: In Alabama v. White, the dissent objected
Q12: Factors that must be considered when assessing
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents