In United States v. Place, the defendant challenged his 90 minute detention pursuant to a Terry stop at LaGuardia airport. The Court:
A) Ruled against the defendant, holding that the circumstances justified the length of the stop because one would reasonably expect delays in receiving one's luggage when arriving on an international flight at a busy airport
B) Ruled in favor of the defendant, holding that the length of detention exceeded the detention time limit previously established in United States v. Sharpe
C) Ruled against the defendant, holding that the Court has never established the length of detention permissible under a Terry stop and that Place's 90 minute detention was reasonable under the circumstances
D) Ruled in favor of the defendant, holding that the police officers' failure to act in a reasonable and diligent manner caused an unnecessary delay and the 90 minute period made the seizure unreasonable
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: Which of the following statements should be
Q16: Which of the following is incorrect about
Q17: The Court's inquiry into the constitutionality of
Q18: Once an individual is stopped pursuant to
Q19: In United States v. Sharpe, the defendant
Q21: In United States v. Montoya de Hernandez,
Q22: Which of the following represents a true
Q23: What is the inquiry made by the
Q24: In State v. Munson, late at night
Q25: In United States v. Gallegos, the police
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents