In Florida v. Bostick, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the proper inquiry to make to determine if Bostick was seized by the agents who boarded the bus and searched Bostick's luggage after Bostick gave them consent to do so is:
A) In light of the totality of the circumstances, would a reasonable person feel free to decline the officer's request or terminate the police encounter?
B) Was there clear and convincing evidence that was seized by the police, and did he give consent for them to search his luggage search to prevent the use of force against him?
C) Given the location of the police activity, would a reasonable person have been able to pick up their luggage and leave the bus?
D) Was the boarding and searching of the bus of such duration that the police activity constituted a seizure?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: To determine if an interaction between a
Q27: Circumstances that might indicate a seizure under
Q28: A(n) _ occurs when a police officer
Q29: A(n) _ occurs when law enforcement officers
Q30: In Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado,
Q32: The primary purpose of searches and seizures
Q33: The contents of a conversation in the
Q34: The Fourth Amendment is directed at searches
Q35: The police enter Craig's office while he
Q36: The issue before the Court in Katz
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents