In which of the following cases did the Court find that the defendant had standing to suppress based on unreasonable search and seizure?
A) The police stopped a vehicle believed to have been involved in a robbery. The vehicle contained two passengers-neither of whom owned the vehicle. A search of the vehicle turned up a firearm under the front seat. The passengers filed a motion to suppress the evidence based on an unreasonable search.
B) The police entered a home without a warrant or consent, looking for a suspected murder who was believed to be an overnight guest in the home. The suspect was found hiding in a closet. The suspect filed a motion to suppress based on an unreasonable search.
C) Defendant Cox was directed by a police officer to empty the contents of her purse. When she did so, a jar of illegal drugs was among the contents. Her boyfriend, who was with her at the time, claimed the drugs were his. The boyfriend field a motion to suppress based on an unreasonable search.
D) None of the above cases resulted in a finding of standing.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: If a pretrial motion to suppress evidence
Q17: In a pretrial challenge to a search
Q18: If evidence was seized from a warrantless
Q19: Defendant Dan timely filed a motion to
Q20: The legal test applied for standing in
Q22: _ is a method created by the
Q23: Which of the following represents the rationale
Q24: The following statement is not a correct
Q25: _ occurs when the connection between the
Q26: A police officer conducted an unlawful search
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents