Lay witness John is about to testify that he recognized the handwriting as that of the defendant's. Which of the following statements is true?
A) John's testimony on this issue would be inadmissible unless John was a certified handwriting expert.
B) John's testimony would be admissible under common law but not under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
C) John's testimony on this subject matter is considered identity evidence.
D) John's testimony would be admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence provided the testimony met the two requirements laid out in Federal Rule 701.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Federal Rule of Evidence 702 requires which
Q5: _ is an inference from the perceived
Q6: Under common law, which of the following
Q7: Areas where a judge, applying the Federal
Q8: Which of the following would be admissible
Q10: Expert witnesses are witnesses who qualify by:
A)
Q11: All of the following are concerns raised
Q12: The Frye test:
A) Was established by the
Q13: Which of the following statements is correct
Q14: Factors considered under Daubert to determine the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents