Witnesses testified that on 2 previous occasions, they heard Bob threaten to harm the neighbors' dog. This evidence can be introduced at Gary's trial for killing the dog as circumstantial evidence that Bob killed the dog.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This evidence can be introduced as circumstantial evidence to suggest Bob had a motive or inclination to harm the dog, which could indirectly indicate his involvement in the dog's death.

Witnesses Testified That on 2 Previous Occasions, They Heard Bob