Zero pollution is always more socially optimal than having some pollution.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

While zero pollution might seem ideal, it is not always socially optimal due to the economic costs and practical limitations of achieving it. In many cases, the benefits of certain activities that generate pollution (e.g., manufacturing, transportation) outweigh the costs of completely eliminating their emissions, making a certain level of pollution acceptable or even necessary for societal welfare and economic development.

Zero Pollution Is Always More Socially Optimal Than Having Some