Data have improved recently, but because of variations in quality of data, definitions of crime, recording practices, ideological differences, and differences in measurement, (three things) caution is still warranted.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The variations in quality of data, definitions of crime, recording practices, ideological differences, and differences in measurement indeed suggest that caution is warranted when interpreting crime statistics, as these factors can significantly affect the comparability and reliability of crime data.

Data Have Improved Recently, but Because of Variations in Quality