Solved

Why Was the Defendant in Smith V Hughes Not Liable

Question 4

Multiple Choice

Why was the defendant in Smith v Hughes not liable to pay the contract price for the new oats?


A) Old oats were discussed before the oral contract was concluded.
B) Old oats were not discussed but the seller knew that the buyer believed that the oats were in fact old.
C) The seller knew that the buyer was contracting for old oats.
D) All of the options provided are correct.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents