Which of the following statements is the most accurate explanation of what the positioning of the names tells us about the case of Baxter v Hirst (2012) , a civil (non-family) case being heard at first instance?
A) Baxter is the claimant and Hirst is the defendant.
B) Baxter is the plaintiff and Hirst is the defendant.
C) Baxter is the claimant and Hirst is the respondent.
D) Baxter is the applicant and Hirst is the defendant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: All Acts are divided into sections, but
Q6: The date of commencement of an Act
Q7: What do the square brackets indicate in
Q8: Schedules can be found at the end
Q9: The purpose in passing a Statute Law
Q11: 'Ex parte' in the title of a
Q12: If you were correctly to read out
Q13: Match each word with its definition.
-Affirmed
A) This
Q14: Match each word with its definition.
-Applied.
A) This
Q15: Match each word with its definition.
-Approved.
A) This
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents