Compound potentiation observed with tastes and odors is not truly unique. Which statement best supports that assertion?
A) Odor cues are distal stimuli and part of the skin defense system, whereas tastes are proximal cues and part of the gut defense system; thus the two cues do not interfere or compete with each other.
B) A standard within-compound association forms between odor and taste, just like with other stimuli outside the taste aversion paradigm.
C) As a result of evolution and the way organisms' sensory systems integrate input, organisms are "prepared" to learn odor-taste aversions.
D) Any relevant cue is more likely to show potentiation effects when it is very nonsalient and presented in compound with a strongly salient cue.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: Which outcome could suggest that a flavor's
Q25: Is the lack of a US revaluation
Q26: In compound potentiation studies, the weaker CS
Q27: Is compound potentiation a counterintuitive result?
A) Yes,
Q28: Travis is listening to new loud music
Q30: Which statement about compound potentiation studies is
Q31: Taste aversion research has led to significant
Q32: An exaptation is a(n)
A) genetic trait that
Q33: An example of exaptation is the genetic
Q34: General laws of learning could have resulted
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents