Contra-causal freedom seems to imply a causal break somewhere in the choice process because
A) otherwise our choices would be governed by causal laws.
B) otherwise we would not have freedom of action.
C) otherwise our choices would be fated.
D) None of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Contra-causal freedom, by definition, suggests that our choices are not determined by prior causes or causal laws. If our choices were governed by causal laws, then they would not be contra-causally free, as the essence of contra-causal freedom is the ability to make choices independent of the causal chain of events.

Contra-Causal Freedom Seems to Imply a Causal Break Somewhere in the Choice