According to Moore's response, skeptical arguments are unconvincing because
A) their premises are less plausible than the denial of their conclusion.
B) the argument commits a logical fallacy.
C) skeptical scenarios are too farfetched.
D) the skeptic can't prove that the skeptical scenarios are true.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Moore argues that skeptical arguments are unconvincing because their premises are less plausible than the simple denial of their conclusion. He believes that common sense beliefs about the world are more credible than the skeptical premises that call these beliefs into question.

According to Moore's Response, Skeptical Arguments Are Unconvincing Because