Why might Jones₃ not work as a counterexample to the principle of alternate possibilities?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The principle of alternate possibilities suggests that an agent is morally responsible for an action only if they could have done otherwise. In the case of Jones₃, if the sense of "could not do otherwise" does not align with the principle's focus on moral responsibility and free choice, then it wouldn't serve as a valid counterexample. The principle is concerned with whether an agent had genuine alternatives from a moral standpoint, not just physical or causal impossibility.

Why Might Jones3 Not Work as a Counterexample to the Principle

Why Might Jones₃ Not Work as a Counterexample to the Principle