How does Fischer explain the asymmetry of supervenience between responsibility and knowledge?
A) We tend to individuate mechanisms in action theory but not in knowledge
B) We tend to individuate mechanisms more finely in action theory than in knowledge
C) We tend to individuate mechanisms more loosely in action theory than in knowledge
D) We tend to individuate mechanisms in knowledge but not in action theory
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q227: What kind of model of moral-responsibility do
Q228: Which of the following isn't a way
Q229: According to Fischer, _ is necessary for
Q230: Fischer advocates which kind of theory of
Q231: Fischer holds that the connection between reasons
Q233: For Fischer, a mechanism is only relevant
Q234: Why is a (nonalcoholic) drunk driver morally
Q235: What does Fischer mean when he says
Q236: Fischer holds that an agent can be
Q237: The causal history doesn't matter in determining
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents