What, according to O'Neill, is it to use someone as a "mere means"?
A) It is to involve someone in a scheme of action to which they could not in principle consent
B) It is to involve someone in a scheme of action that harms them
C) It is to involve someone in a scheme of action that recognizes their value as a person
D) It is to involve someone in a scheme of action that uses them for some other end
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q86: An "imperative" is the formulation of an
Q87: A hypothetical imperative represents an action as
Q88: For Kant, not all rational beings have
Q89: For Kant, what is the supreme moral
Q90: What does O'Neill mean by the term
Q92: Which of the following is an example
Q93: Which of the following best describes what
Q94: For O'Neill, if one is a member
Q95: According to Kantian ethics . . .
A)
Q96: Why, for Kantians, would relieving famine be
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents