For Kant, if I cash a check at a bank, I don't necessarily use the bank teller as a mere means.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

According to Kant, using someone as a means to an end is not inherently wrong as long as you also respect their autonomy and treat them as an end in themselves. Cashing a check at a bank involves a mutual exchange where both parties benefit, and the bank teller is performing their role within the context of their job, which is aligned with their purposes and goals.

For Kant, If I Cash a Check at a Bank