The DROWNING CHILD argument, based on Peter Singer's work, is supposed to show that most Americans are obligated to donate money to fight global poverty.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Drowning Child argument by Peter Singer illustrates that if we can prevent something bad from happening without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought to do it. This analogy is used to argue that people should donate to alleviate global poverty, as the moral obligation to save a drowning child extends to helping those in need when it is within our means to do so without significant sacrifice.

The DROWNING CHILD Argument, Based on Peter Singer's Work, Is