How does Strawser respond to the objection that using drones will lead to more noncombatant deaths?
A) By arguing that noncombatant deaths in drone strikes are collateral casualties rather than intended effects and that the obligation to protect one's own warfighters overrides the obligation to protect enemy civilians.
B) By arguing that drones make it easier to distinguish combatants from noncombatants and that evidence suggests that the ratio of noncombatants killed to combatants killed is lower for drones than for other means of combat.
C) By arguing that although drone strikes currently kill more noncombatants than some other forms of combat, continued use of drones will lead to improvements in drone technology that reduce the number of noncombatants killed.
D) By arguing that because his central claim, OP, is only about justified military operations and operations that kill civilians are not justified, his claim does not apply to drone strikes that kill civilians.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Which of the following is NOT true
Q6: Which of the following best expresses Strawser's
Q7: Why does Strawser discuss the example of
Q8: Why does Strawser discuss the claim that
Q9: Which of the following best captures the
Q11: How does Strawser respond to the objection
Q12: Which of the following best expresses the
Q13: How does Strawser respond to the objection
Q14: What is the difference between an "uninhabited
Q15: Which of the following is most plausibly
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents