Which of the Following Would Count as an Objection to Eaton's

Which of the following would count as an objection to Eaton's argument that antiporn feminism is sensible if it employs a scientifically plausible conception of causation and analyzes the variety of harms that pornography potentially causes?

A) Antiporn feminism should be analyzed as employing a deterministic conception of causation because this would allow critics to show that anitporn feminism is unsupported by the available evidence, which does not establish that pornography alone is sufficient to cause harm.
B) Although analyzing pornography's potential harms is important, Eaton's consequentialist argument does not take into consideration right-based arguments as to whether pornography or its condemnation violates rights, such as women's rights or the right to free speech.
C) Because there are too many complex and nuanced factors when it comes to analyzing pornography's potential harms, antiporn feminism cannot be determined as sensible or not.
D) Antiporn feminism does not take into consideration the fact that gender inequity and sexist attitudes are what cause people to desire pornography in the first place.