Which of the following best captures the cost-benefit analysis argument for the permissibility of nonlethal torture?
A) Nonlethal torture is permissible because the lives of multiple innocent people should be valued more than the bodily integrity of one guilty person.
B) Nonlethal torture is permissible because it is generally the most effective means of intelligence gathering regarding future acts of terrorism.
C) Nonlethal torture is permissible because it acts as a deterrent to future acts of terrorism.
D) Nonlethal torture is permissible because it is an acceptable form of retaliation for past acts of terrorism.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The cost-benefit analysis argument for the permissibility of nonlethal torture typically emphasizes the greater good, suggesting that the potential to save multiple innocent lives outweighs the harm caused to one individual, especially if that individual is guilty of terrorism or holds critical information that could prevent future attacks.

Which of the Following Best Captures the Cost-Benefit Analysis Argument