Why does Sinnott-Armstrong discuss the "universalizability principle?"
A) To argue that the principle, if it were plausible, would entail that individuals are morally obligated to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
B) To argue against the principle by pointing out its implications for individuals' right to emit greenhouse gases.
C) To argue for the principle on the grounds that only it can explain individuals' moral obligation to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
D) To argue that the principle does not entail an individual obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q274: Which of the following best captures Sinnott-Armstrong's
Q275: Which of the following best captures Sinnott-Armstrong's
Q276: Which of the following is among the
Q277: What is the connection, according to Sinnott-Armstrong,
Q278: Which of the following best captures Sinnott-Armstrong's
Q280: Which of the following best captures Sinnott-Armstrong's
Q281: Why does Sinnott-Armstrong reject the principle that
Q282: Which of the following does Sinnott-Armstrong think
Q283: Which of the following best captures Sinnott-Armstrong's
Q284: What can we infer, according to Sinnott-Armstrong,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents