Nathanson argues that "payback" retributivism is incapable of distinguishing intentional from accidental killing.

Name: Nathanson argues that "payback" retributivism is incapable of distinguishing intentional from accidental killing.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.8 (43 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Nathanson argues that "payback" retributivism, which focuses on punishing offenders as they deserve, fails to adequately distinguish between intentional and accidental killings because it primarily looks at the harm caused rather than the intent behind the action.

Nathanson Argues That "Payback" Retributivism Is Incapable of Distinguishing Intentional