How does Singer understand the phrase "without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance"?
A) Singer thinks it means one should always promote what is good and not merely prevent what is bad, because promoting good is the opposite side of the coin to preventing bad.
B) Singer thinks it means one should never sacrifice one's own interests to help someone else because one's own interests are more important than the interests of others.
C) Singer thinks it means one should never do something wrong in itself because evils are always incomparable.
D) Singer thinks it means one should not cause anything comparably bad from happening, do something wrong in itself, or fail to promote a good comparable in significance to the bad one can prevent.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Singer's interpretation of "without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance" suggests a balance between not causing comparable harm, avoiding wrong actions, and promoting good that is equivalent in importance to the bad that can be prevented. This reflects his ethical stance on doing the most good without causing harm of similar moral weight.

How Does Singer Understand the Phrase "Without Sacrificing Anything of Comparable