Assume that Singer is correct that the traditional distinction between charity and duty should be overturned. Which of the following could you infer from that claim?
A) People who donate to charities are generous and are doing something they need not do, and people who do not donate to charities need not be condemned.
B) People should contribute to famine relief until they reach the level of marginal utility in which any further contribution would cause them just as much as suffering as they would relieve by giving.
C) People should not be praised for their generosity when contributing to charities any more than they should be praised for fulfilling their obligations, and people should be condemned if they do not contribute enough to famine relief.
D) Contributing to charity is similar to joining the military in that both are cases where people are doing their duty, but both are actions people need not do.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q493: What of the following best captures Singer's
Q494: Which of the following best captures Singer's
Q495: Which of the following best captures Singer's
Q496: What is the distinction between the strong
Q497: Which of the following can we infer
Q499: Which of the following would count as
Q500: Which of the following would count as
Q501: Singer's argues that if it is in
Q502: Singer thinks that whether someone is close
Q503: Singer thinks that there is a morally
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents