What role does the distinction between killing someone and allowing someone to die play in Nell's paper?
A) Nell's main thesis is that there is a morally relevant distinction between killing someone and allowing someone to die.
B) Nell argues that famine deaths are cases of killing, which we have duties to prevent, and not simply of allowing someone to die, which we have no duties to prevent.
C) Nell argues that under sufficiency situations, famine deaths mean we are killing people by not distributing resources properly, whereas under scarcity situations, famine deaths are simply cases of letting people die.
D) Nell claims that although killing someone and allowing some to die are distinct, we have duties both to not kill people and to not allow people to die.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q551: Which of the following best captures the
Q552: Which of the following best captures Nell's
Q553: Why does Nell discuss lifeboat situations in
Q554: What of the following is the best
Q555: What is the difference between killing someone
Q557: Which of the following can we infer
Q558: Assume that Nell is correct that third
Q559: Which of the following would count as
Q560: Which of the following would count as
Q561: Nell argues that the right not to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents