Which of the following best captures Broome's main argument in "Private Morality and Climate Change?"
A) Your greenhouse gas emissions will impose a significant risk of harm on other people. The lack of certainty about those harms is no reason to avoid reducing your emissions. Therefore, you ought to reduce your greenhouse gas emissions to zero.
B) Your greenhouse gas emissions will cause serious harm to many people. You cannot effectively prevent all of that harm because offsetting is ineffective and unjust. Still, you are morally obligated to reduce your emissions as much as you can.
C) Your greenhouse gas emissions will unjustly harm other people. You can easily prevent that harm by offsetting your greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, you are morally obligated to offset your greenhouse gas emissions.
D) Your greenhouse gas emissions will seriously harm other people. Because of the number of people your emissions will harm, reducing or offsetting those emissions is the most effective and efficient way to make the world better. Therefore, you ought to reduce your emissions as far as possible and offset the rest of them.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q770: What does it mean to offset your
Q771: Why should your offset your greenhouse gas
Q772: Which of the following would NOT count
Q773: How does Broome respond to the objection
Q774: Which of the following can we infer
Q776: John Broome argues that because your greenhouse
Q777: In "Private Morality and Climate Change," Broome
Q778: The "social cost of carbon" is the
Q779: According to Broome, the greenhouse gas emissions
Q780: Broome argues that although the average person
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents