Rachels argues that the traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia and the conventional doctrine that only the latter is permissible can lead to decisions over life or death being made on irrelevant moral grounds.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is not morally significant and that accepting passive euthanasia while rejecting active euthanasia can lead to decisions that are not based on relevant moral considerations.

Rachels Argues That the Traditional Distinction Between Active and Passive