According to Rachels, the cessation of treatment in many cases can be considered legitimate instances of the intentional termination of life of one human being by another.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that there is no moral difference between killing and letting die in certain contexts, implying that the cessation of treatment (letting die) can be morally equivalent to the intentional termination of life (killing), and thus can be considered legitimate in some cases.

According to Rachels, the Cessation of Treatment in Many Cases