Which of the following would count as an objection to Gay-Williams's argument from nature?
A) Euthanasia is not against humans' natural purposes because humans have no such inherent purposes.
B) Humans have a duty not to take their own lives principally because they are only temporary custodians of their God-given bodies.
C) Euthanasia is against our natural purposes because suffering is also a natural part of life.
D) Euthanasia of the terminally ill should be permitted because the possibility of "miraculous" recovery, although existent, is incredibly remote.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Gay-Williams's argument from nature against euthanasia posits that euthanasia is contrary to human beings' natural purposes. Choice A objects to this by challenging the premise that humans have inherent natural purposes, thereby directly opposing Gay-Williams's foundational assumption.

Which of the Following Would Count as an Objection to Gay-Williams's