Which of the following best expresses the basic question that Cheryl Abbate is trying to answer in "Assuming Risk: A Critical Analysis of a Soldier's Duty to Prevent Collateral Casualties"?
A) When are soldiers obligated to avoid collateral casualties?
B) Do soldiers or commanders have a greater obligation to decide which risks are appropriate for avoiding collateral casualties?
C) Do soldiers have a moral obligation to assume extra risks to avoid collateral casualties?
D) Is it permissible to injure or kill civilians as a foreseen side effect of achieving a legitimate military objective?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Cheryl Abbate's work focuses on the ethical considerations surrounding a soldier's duty to assume additional risks to minimize harm to civilians, thus the core question she addresses is the moral obligation of soldiers in this context.

Which of the Following Best Expresses the Basic Question That