The Court has generally held that virtually anything can be admitted as a _________ factor and that such factors must be considered by the sentencing authority at any stage of the process.
A) Mitigating
B) Aggravating
C) Both aggravating and mitigating
D) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: The eligibility function:
A) Serves to guide the
Q4: What are the two primary functions of
Q5: Aggravating factors generally revolve around three factors,
Q6: Unanimity is not required for _ factors
Q7: In _, the Court upheld that psychiatric
Q9: Which case held that testimony about the
Q10: What are aggravating factors often based on?
A)
Q11: Aggravating-only statutes:
A) Call upon a jury to
Q12: In Gregg v. Georgia, the Court indicated
Q13: Mitigating circumstances are those that provide some
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents