Which Supreme Court case held that a sentencing body may not refuse to consider a pertinent mitigating fact even when that fact has been deemed insignificant?
A) Lockett v. Ohio
B) Eddings v. Oklahoma
C) Furman v. Georgia
D) Netherland v. Gray
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: _ has interpreted the due process clause
Q2: Key areas of the death penalty law
Q3: The Gregg Court extended the concept of
Q4: The Woodson Court concluded that the North
Q5: In Locket v. Ohio, the Court expanded
Q7: Capital juries often must decide whether a
Q8: In California v. Ramos, the Court held
Q9: If the judge, not the jury, determines
Q10: The Court began its opinion addressing the
Q11: The court's ruling on shackling was based
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents