Developing a two-part test for making a determination of whether a capital defendant was provided ineffective assistance of counsel, the Court in _____________ said that such a claim was valid only if: (1) the counsel's performance was objectively unreasonable, and (2) there was a reasonable likelihood that the trial would have had a different outcome because of such performance.
A) Wiggins v. Smith
B) Strickland v. Washington
C) United States v. Cronic
D) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which Amendment of the United States Constitution
Q3: On appeal, the Court held that in
Q4: In the Holland case, the Supreme Court
Q5: Maples v. Thomas is a case exemplifying
Q6: In Holland, Clair, and Martinez, the Court
Q7: According to the text, what percent of
Q8: In 1989, Kevin Wiggins was convicted of
Q9: In the case of Smith v. Spisak,
Q10: In Cronic, the Court considered five factors
Q11: In the interest of maintaining _, at
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents