In the Holland case, the Supreme Court held that a prisoner is entitled to_______________ if he can demonstrate that he has been pursuing his rights diligently, and that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way and prevented timely filing.
A) Equitable tolling of filing procedures
B) Communicate and "satisfy professional standards of care"
C) Investigate evidence that is potentially valuable
D) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which Amendment of the United States Constitution
Q2: Developing a two-part test for making a
Q3: On appeal, the Court held that in
Q5: Maples v. Thomas is a case exemplifying
Q6: In Holland, Clair, and Martinez, the Court
Q7: According to the text, what percent of
Q8: In 1989, Kevin Wiggins was convicted of
Q9: In the case of Smith v. Spisak,
Q10: In Cronic, the Court considered five factors
Q11: In the interest of maintaining _, at
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents