In this essay Chisholm argues that free actions are possible because they are caused not by indefinitely long sequences of preceding events but rather by an agent (or self). He calls the former kind of causation "event causation" and the latter "agent causation." In his view, when we act freely, we act like God-a prime mover that is itself unmoved, an uncaused cause of events.
-Chisholm says that some acts are not caused at all.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Chisholm argues that free actions are indeed caused, but they are caused by agents themselves rather than by preceding events. He distinguishes between "event causation" and "agent causation," advocating for the latter in the context of free actions. He does not claim that some acts are not caused at all; rather, he posits that when we act freely, we are the initiators (or unmoved movers) of our actions, similar to the concept of a prime mover or an uncaused cause, but he maintains that these actions are still caused by the agent.

In This Essay Chisholm Argues That Free Actions Are Possible