Wolff sets forth a version of anarchism, holding that all forms of government violate our overriding duty to act autonomously. Wolff's argument (and essay) can be divided into two parts. In the first he describes the meaning of political authority, distinguishing it from mere power. In the second part he defines autonomy and argues that it is incompatible with accepting authority.
-Wolff says that the anarchist may grant the necessity of complying with the law under certain circumstance.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Robert Paul Wolff, in his work "In Defense of Anarchism," argues that the concept of authority in any form is inherently at odds with the principle of individual autonomy. He distinguishes between authority (legitimate power) and power (the ability to compel behavior), and asserts that true autonomy requires making one's own decisions, which is incompatible with submitting to the will of another, including a government. Wolff does acknowledge situations where obeying the law might be necessary, but maintains this does not equate to accepting its authority, thus presenting a nuanced view of anarchism.

Wolff Sets Forth a Version of Anarchism, Holding That All