Does the court have a discretion to exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible?
Select the best answer from those listed below.
A) Yes, the CPR allows the court to control the evidence and exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.
B) Yes, the court has always had the power to exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.
C) No the court does not have the power, since the introduction of the CPR, to exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.
D) No, the court has never had the power to exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following is more likely
Q3: Referring to the law of 'rebuttable presumptions'
Q4: Which is not correct?
In civil litigation the
Q5: Which of the following is an exception
Q6: Which is correct?
A witness in a civil
Q7: There is a general rule that the
Q8: Which of the following does not represent
Q9: Which is not correct?
S. 11 of the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents