in Jones v. Kernott the court concluded that each party was entitled to 50 per cent of the sale proceeds because they could not infer a common intention that the shares be held in proportions other than this.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Jones v. Kernott, the court concluded that it was possible to infer a common intention that the shares in the property were to be held in different proportions, ultimately deciding that Ms. Jones was entitled to a 90% share and Mr. Kernott to 10%, based on their contributions and changes in circumstances over time.

In Jones V