In which case was it held that if an adverse possessor of unregistered land acknowledges the paper owner's title after the 12 years limitation period has run, he cannot rely on his adverse possession as a defence to an action for possession from the paper owner?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Colchester BC v. Smith, it was held that if an adverse possessor acknowledges the paper owner's title after the 12-year limitation period, he cannot rely on adverse possession as a defense to an action for possession.

In Which Case Was It Held That If an Adverse