One expert's analysis of stop-and-frisk reports indicated that 95,000 of the reports by officers involved "reasonable, articulable suspicion," and thus was NOT a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement implies that the expert's analysis found that in 95,000 instances, the stop-and-frisk actions were based on "reasonable, articulable suspicion," which aligns with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment to not be considered a violation. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and actions based on reasonable suspicion are considered lawful under this amendment.

One Expert's Analysis of Stop-And-Frisk Reports Indicated That 95,000 of the Reports