At the University of Winnipeg where author Kimberley Ducey teaches, the Indigenous Course Requirement (ICR) made Indigenous learning part of the undergraduate degree requirements for all inbound students beginning in 2016. This is one part of what Canadians refer to as "Indigenization strategy" and it is central to the University of Winnipeg's fulfillment of its academic mission to engage with the society in which it is situated. According to the University's website:
The University of Winnipeg is located on Treaty One [between Indigenous people and the Canadian government] land in the heart of the Métis Nation [major Indigenous group]. The treaties are agreements which benefit all people, and opened up these lands for settlement. The Métis played a pivotal role in bringing our province into confederation. We believe that as a post-secondary institution, therefore, we must provide an excellent academic experience which is also grounded in the territory in which it is located. This means providing our students with an understanding of the local history, cultures, contemporary issues, languages, and ways of knowing of local Indigenous peoples. . . . The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada has recommended that Indigenous content be taught to future educators, lawyers, health care professionals, social workers, newcomers, public sector employees, and everyone in the private sector. In short, in order for reconciliation with Indigenous peoples to be possible, everyone in Canada, including every student at The University of Winnipeg, should be helped to learn a baseline of knowledge about First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples.
Do you think "Indigenization strategies" similar to the one at the University of Winnipeg should be adopted by U.S. universities and collages? Why or why not? What about educational strategies that give attention to the history, cultures, and contemporary issues of other Americans of color? Why or why not?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of At the University of Winnipeg where author Kimberley Ducey teaches, the Indigenous Course Requirement (ICR) made Indigenous learning part of the undergraduate degree requirements for all inbound students beginning in 2016. This is one part of what Canadians refer to as "Indigenization strategy" and it is central to the University of Winnipeg's fulfillment of its academic mission to engage with the society in which it is situated. According to the University's website:
The University of Winnipeg is located on Treaty One [between Indigenous people and the Canadian government] land in the heart of the Métis Nation [major Indigenous group]. The treaties are agreements which benefit all people, and opened up these lands for settlement. The Métis played a pivotal role in bringing our province into confederation. We believe that as a post-secondary institution, therefore, we must provide an excellent academic experience which is also grounded in the territory in which it is located. This means providing our students with an understanding of the local history, cultures, contemporary issues, languages, and ways of knowing of local Indigenous peoples. . . . The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada has recommended that Indigenous content be taught to future educators, lawyers, health care professionals, social workers, newcomers, public sector employees, and everyone in the private sector. In short, in order for reconciliation with Indigenous peoples to be possible, everyone in Canada, including every student at The University of Winnipeg, should be helped to learn a baseline of knowledge about First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples.
Do you think "Indigenization strategies" similar to the one at the University of Winnipeg should be adopted by U.S. universities and collages? Why or why not? What about educational strategies that give attention to the history, cultures, and contemporary issues of other Americans of color? Why or why not?

At the University of Winnipeg Where Author Kimberley Ducey Teaches